Historical derivation — preserved in full
Source: engines/quan_loncar_v1/lineage/phases_01_28/quan_loncar_complete_lineage_phases_01_28/fryett_q_series_phase8/DERIVATION_PHASE8.md
Snapshot: Quan–Lončar complete lineage, phases 1–28. The body below is unabridged.
Phase 8 derivation: through-thickness convergence¶
1. Exact Legendre overlap¶
The hole perturbation fills the same thickness interval as the rectangular waveguide basis. With normalized Legendre functions, the z projection is
Consequently, retaining hole degree ell=1 requires waveguide degree z at
least one. No numerical z quadrature is introduced.
2. Controlled sequence¶
At fixed in-plane degree three and sector (-1,-1,+1), evaluate
- hole z degree 0, waveguide z degree 0;
- hole z degree 0, waveguide z degree 1;
- hole z degree 1, waveguide z degree 1.
The first difference is the background-waveguide truncation effect. The second is the contribution of new physical hole-field coefficients.
For z-even sector sign s_z=+1, the old degree-zero modes contain the allowed
E_x and E_y components. The new odd scalar Legendre modes can contribute
only through E_z, whose polar-vector mirror sign supplies the second minus
sign. Exact mirror reduction changes the sector dimension from 450 to 630,
instead of doubling it blindly to 900.
3. Numerical result¶
At the common in-plane degree-three baseline,
The separate relative increments are
Thus degree-one through-thickness hole structure is not the source of the
missing high Q. The result is not yet a thickness convergence proof because
Legendre degree two has different mirror/component content: it introduces
even-z E_x and E_y functions rather than another copy of the odd-z E_z
subspace.