2.5D LDOS cavity optimizerhoodlab · 780 nm

Scientific ledger

Optimization run archive

Accepted results, qualified transfer evidence, and rejected interpretations live together. A failed gate stays visible because it changes what we do next.

RunStatusEvidence levelDate
Live 780 nm production optimization · currentcheckpointedQualified production grid; every-step direct gates and periodic Q validation2026-08-17
780 nm production qualificationacceptedSymmetry-reduced, grid/domain-converged fixed-frequency launch gates2026-08-17
2.5D parity qualificationacceptedExact reduced-basis equivalence and derivative validation2026-08-16
780 nm atom proposalproposalRadiation-aware 2.5D driven response; pole gates pending2026-08-15
780 nm vector blockerblockedRefined-grid attempt; no Maxwell field returned2026-08-15
780 nm mode blockerblocked2.5D acceptance attempt; no residual returned2026-08-15
Linewidth step 001acceptedControlled-grid full-vector2026-08-15
Upper-pole diagnosticrejectedControlled-grid full-vector diagnostic2026-08-15
Paired 3D transferqualified3D candidate; pole gate not accepted2026-08-15
Cross-basis validationacceptedBasis-stable 2.5D candidate2026-08-15
Scalar 2.5D runacceptedReduced-model optimization2026-08-15
2026-08-17 · Qualified production grid; every-step direct gates and periodic Q validation

Live 780 nm production optimization

The qualified 40 x 70 x 28 component-symmetry-reduced Maxwell solver is optimizing the centered z-dipole response at exactly 780 nm without a preset iteration count. Direct gates run every step; the independent 81-point, seven-probe Q diagnostic runs every tenth step and intervening checkpoints are provisional.

checkpointed Open record →
2026-08-17 · Symmetry-reduced, grid/domain-converged fixed-frequency launch gates

780 nm production qualification

All five launch gates pass for the fixed-frequency 780 nm atom-coupling optimizer. Component-correct parity cuts the production system from 235,200 physical unknowns to 29,499, grid/domain changes are 0.36%/1.19%, and an exact-grid trial improves coupling. The exact production-grid Q diagnostic reports no pole in the target window.

accepted Open record →
2026-08-16 · Exact reduced-basis equivalence and derivative validation

2.5D parity qualification

The symmetric scalar Fourier/FEM atom solve was restricted to its exact even x/y/z sector, reducing the launch basis from 1,701 to 275 unknowns while preserving response, field, and gradient to roundoff.

accepted Open record →
2026-08-15 · Radiation-aware 2.5D driven response; pole gates pending

780 nm atom proposal

The optimizer directly increased the centered-emitter Green-response proxy at exactly 780 nm on a 76 x 40 topology grid with sixteen cells across the protected gap.

proposal Open record →
2026-08-15 · Refined-grid attempt; no Maxwell field returned

780 nm vector blocker

A 40 x 20 x 20 full-vector profile fixed the z-extrusion and geometry resolution, but the propagating semi-infinite lead did not return an initial 780 nm field within 30 minutes.

blocked Open record →
2026-08-15 · 2.5D acceptance attempt; no residual returned

780 nm mode blocker

The direct objective was coupled to strict nonlinear residual, mode identity, localization, and frequency-window gates, but pole reacquisition did not return within the 80-minute cutoff.

blocked Open record →
2026-08-15 · Controlled-grid full-vector

Linewidth step 001

A differentiable topology step improved the directly resolved Fano linewidth Q and passed all 15 physical and spectral gates, including fresh interleaved-frequency validation.

accepted Open record →
2026-08-15 · Controlled-grid full-vector diagnostic

Upper-pole diagnostic

The rational shared-pole estimate and real-axis linewidth estimate disagreed, so the optimizer stopped before attempting a topology update.

rejected Open record →
2026-08-15 · 3D candidate; pole gate not accepted

Paired 3D transfer

Initial and optimized 2.5D densities were fitted independently to the same 3D topology map and their vector modes were reacquired on a common Yee grid.

qualified Open record →
2026-08-15 · Basis-stable 2.5D candidate

Cross-basis validation

The initial and optimized modes were reacquired from scratch on a 3,025-unknown basis, preserving field identity and the Q improvement.

accepted Open record →
2026-08-15 · Reduced-model optimization

Scalar 2.5D run

Four accepted trust-region steps more than doubled the tracked scalar Q while preserving localization, mode identity, the protected air strip, and reflection symmetry.

accepted Open record →