Pulsed vs CW multilayer transmission consistency#
validated · 2026-08-28
This case checks the implementation against an analytical identity, convergence property, or independent physics invariant.
Representative field across a layered material geometry.#
What is exercised#
Self-consistency of PhasorDetector broadband pulse vs CW monochromatic transmission through a 3-layer stack (ported from upstream FDTDX physics test). High-yield: sources, materials, phasors, PML — no FlexCredits.
This case runs at its declared full benchmark resolution (resolution factor 1.0).
Recorded result#
Metric |
Observed / error |
Reference / limit |
Error |
Effective budget |
Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.0253183 |
0 |
0.0253183 |
0.05 |
PASS |
The table is rendered from progress.json; it is not a hand-written success claim. For metrics that report an error directly, the “observed” column repeats that error and the reference column is the acceptance threshold.
Reproduce#
uv run fdtdx-bench run --case analytical_pulsed_vs_cw
Implementation and provenance: benchmarks/cases/analytical_pulsed_vs_cw/case.yaml, benchmarks/cases/analytical_pulsed_vs_cw/run.py.