Si/SiO2 slab TE waveguide transmission vs Tidy3D#
validated · 2026-08-28
This case compares a local FDTDX result with pinned reference data generated by Tidy3D. The originating Tidy3D example is ModalSourcesMonitors.ipynb, pinned at commit c37c785d52e9.
Integrated-photonics geometries covered by the benchmark suite.#
What is exercised#
Lossless slab should transmit ~1.0. FDTDX via calculate_sparam / mode overlap.
This case runs at its declared full benchmark resolution (resolution factor 1.0).
Recorded result#
Metric |
Observed / error |
Reference / limit |
Error |
Effective budget |
Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.00005 |
1 |
5.319e-05 |
0.1 |
PASS |
The table is rendered from progress.json; it is not a hand-written success claim. For metrics that report an error directly, the “observed” column repeats that error and the reference column is the acceptance threshold.
Reproduce#
uv run fdtdx-bench run --case parity_waveguide_TE
Implementation and provenance: benchmarks/cases/parity_waveguide_TE/case.yaml, benchmarks/cases/parity_waveguide_TE/run.py, benchmarks/goldens/parity_waveguide_TE.npz.