Composite SiN/SiO₂ waveguide air-gap sweep#

Status: complete · completed: 205/205 FDTD points · mean wall time: 14.8 s/point.

This is the seed study for the next optimization campaign. Two identical, coaxial square waveguides face one another across air at 780 nm. The composite slices use a square Si₃N₄ core (n=2.0) embedded in a finite square SiO₂ guide (n=1.44); the SiO₂-only controls remove that core. Air surrounds every guide. The incident field is the y-polarized fundamental mode of the complete guide; the output observable is the same forward mode in the opposite guide.

Geometry and port cross-sections

Requested 1 µm SiO₂ slice#

One-micron oxide sweep

Best 150 nm / 1 µm signed Ey field

Requested 2 µm SiO₂ slice#

Two-micron oxide sweep

Best 150 nm / 2 µm signed Ey field

Direct comparison#

Insertion-loss comparison

Added 100 nm SiN / 3 µm SiO₂ slice#

Three-micron oxide sweep

Best 100 nm / 3 µm signed Ey field

This follow-up uses the convergence-qualified 0.20 ps tape and compact 4.75 µm non-PML x domain. Its 3 µm square oxide still has 0.5 µm of air before the transverse PML on every side.

SiO₂-only controls#

These controls remove the Si₃N₄ core while retaining the same square-guide, fixed-port measurement.

1 µm square SiO₂#

One-micron SiO2-only sweep

Best 1 µm SiO2-only signed Ey field

2 µm square SiO₂#

Two-micron SiO2-only sweep

Best 2 µm SiO2-only signed Ey field

Lowest sampled loss#

SiN side (µm)

SiO₂ side (µm)

air gap (µm)

T (%)

loss (dB)

same-mode R (%)

radiation + other modes (%)

0.150

1.000

1.000

46.894

3.2888

7.316

45.790

0.150

2.000

1.175

81.162

0.9065

1.049

17.789

0.100

3.000

1.175

96.809

0.1408

0.126

3.064

none

1.000

1.000

59.490

2.2556

7.035

33.475

none

2.000

1.200

91.364

0.3922

0.060

8.576

The optimum in this table is the best sampled 25 nm grid point, not a continuous fit. Transmission is normalized by a directional input-mode monitor. The residual is reported as raw 1-T-R; a negative value would flag a numerical normalization problem rather than being silently clipped.

Field check#

Best sampled center-frequency fields

Numerical controls#

  • Continuous-guide calibration: 100.033% T and 0.00012% R. The compact 100 nm / 3 µm guide gives 100.000% T and 0.00294% R. The SiO₂-only guides give 100.125% T (1 µm) and 100.041% T (2 µm).

  • Full-domain versus y/z-symmetric transmission difference at the 1 µm gap: 1.192%.

  • 0.20 ps versus 0.40 ps transmission difference at the 2 µm SiO₂ / 1.2 µm gap reference: 0.020%.

  • Compact- versus original-x-domain transmission difference at that reference: 0.038%.

The square guide has a degenerate fundamental polarization pair. The y-PEC and z-PMC walls select its y-polarized member. For the unrestricted full-domain audit, TE/TM sorting is disabled and the highest-effective-index fundamental pair is selected directly; this avoids accidentally comparing against a lower mode branch.

Numerical method#

  • Fixed 25 nm Yee grid; the 150 nm and 100 nm nitride cores span six and four cells, respectively, while the controls contain no nitride.

  • Component-aware Yee material discretization with subpixel-averaged facets.

  • Twelve-cell PML and y/z mirror symmetry; the normalized S-parameter ratio is retained by the modal overlaps. A one-way left-port source forbids direct x symmetry; a correct even/odd x decomposition would require two half-domain simulations.

  • A broadband Gaussian mode pulse is propagated for at most 0.40 ps in the original slices and 0.20 ps in the convergence-qualified compact extension, with relative-energy early termination in both cases.

  • Source and detector planes do not move with the air gap. This keeps port normalization identical across the sweep.

  • The artifact is three-dimensional in (SiN side, SiO₂ side, air gap), so the remaining two parameter directions can be expanded without changing the measurement definition.

The complete setup and motivation are recorded in METHOD.md.